Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by gknoy on Saturday July 05, 2025 @04:31PM
(#44475314)
I appreciate you laying it out like that. I've seen these NVME NAS things mentioned and had been thinking that the reliability of SSDs was so much worse than HDDs.
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by kllrnohj on Saturday July 05, 2025 @07:22PM
(#44476351)
SSDs are just limited write cycles whereas HDDs literally spin themselves to death. In a simple consumer NAS usage, like if this was just photo backup, that basically means SSDs will last forever. Meanwhile those HDDs start hitting borrowed time at 5-8 years, regardless of write cycles.
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by dotancohen on Sunday July 06, 2025 @10:33AM
(#44481131)
I have had two Sandisk 2.5 inch SSDS just suddenly fail. No warning that I could discern, and no way to recover afterwards. Both were while running Debian variants as a / partition, luckily I keep /home on a separate partition.
Any idea what that failure mode could have been? It worries me tremendously to keep data on an SSD now.
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by sandreas on Sunday July 06, 2025 @10:58AM
(#44481301)
I had a Samsung 960 Pro nvme fail without warning, that was even more concerning
Then shortly after I had a BTRFS fail without failing Hardware on another drive
Just backup your stuff with 3-2-1 strategy and you're OK.
I'd recommend a combination of syncthing, restic and ZFS (with zfs-auto-snapshot, sanoid or zrepl) and maybe bluray (as readonly medium)
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by dotancohen on Sunday July 06, 2025 @12:13PM
(#44481965)
I'm considering Amazon Glacier for offline backup. Any opinions, alternatives, or other advice welcome.
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by sandreas on Sunday July 06, 2025 @12:48PM
(#44482218)
Isn't Amazon Glacier cloud based?
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by dotancohen on Sunday July 06, 2025 @03:56PM
(#44483539)
Yes, I mean for off site backup. It's too late to edit that comment.
And these prices are getting low enough, especially with this NUC-based solutions, to actually be price competitive with the low tiers of drive & dropbox while also being something you actually own and control. Dropbox still charges $120/yr for the entry level plan of just 2TB after all. 3x WD Blue NVMEs + an N150 and you're at break-even in 3 years or less