News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip. Parent comment

Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip by sandreas on Sunday July 06, 2025 @10:58AM (#44481301)
I had a Samsung 960 Pro nvme fail without warning, that was even more concerning

Then shortly after I had a BTRFS fail without failing Hardware on another drive

Just backup your stuff with 3-2-1 strategy and you're OK.

I'd recommend a combination of syncthing, restic and ZFS (with zfs-auto-snapshot, sanoid or zrepl) and maybe bluray (as readonly medium)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip by dotancohen on Sunday July 06, 2025 @12:13PM (#44481965)
I'm considering Amazon Glacier for offline backup. Any opinions, alternatives, or other advice welcome.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip by sandreas on Sunday July 06, 2025 @12:48PM (#44482218)
Isn't Amazon Glacier cloud based?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip by dotancohen on Sunday July 06, 2025 @03:56PM (#44483539)
Yes, I mean for off site backup. It's too late to edit that comment.
[ Parent | on HN ]