News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Congratulations PG on the coming child by fiaz on Thursday January 22, 2009 @08:42AM (#444723)
The ultimate startup

Congrats!

Re:Congratulations PG on the coming child by aaronblohowiak on Thursday January 22, 2009 @03:26PM (#445317)
It is peculiar that we congratulate people on completing a compulsive bodily function.
Re:Congratulations PG on the coming child by sanj on Thursday January 22, 2009 @06:50PM (#445629)
Except that we're not.

For many of us, the advent and wide deployment of birth control allows us to choose if and when we decide to procreate. Part of the downside of this is that we're often waiting until we're older before we decide to have kids.

It'd be inappropriate for me to comment on JL's age, but from experiences personal and nearby, getting pregnant has the potential to be stressful, depressing, and exciting. And at times it just doesn't happen.

Congratulations are in order because they've decided to take a chunk of their lives and time to take responsibility for another human being. And because the deep-seated happiness that comes from it is a gift worth congratulations.

ps. congrats!

Re:Congratulations PG on the coming child by tdavis on Thursday January 22, 2009 @03:45PM (#445344)
I think it's a sort of "I'm happy you're happy" thing. Whenever I congratulate someone on having a child, I'm not literally congratulating them on having sex and spawning another human. That would be silly.

Although, there are many couples who can't get pregnant who would like to, so in cases like that, maybe literal congratulations would be in order?

Re:Congratulations PG on the coming child by flashgordon on Thursday January 22, 2009 @06:53PM (#445632)
actually thats not true... we are congratulating the birth, not the conception!!