Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by dwedge on Saturday July 05, 2025 @06:54AM
(#44471796)
If the drives are the same age and large parts of the drive haven't been read from for a long time until the rebuild you might find it already failed. Anecdotally around 12 years ago the chances of a second disk failing during a raid 5 rebuild (in our setup) was probably more like 10-20%
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by Dylan16807 on Saturday July 05, 2025 @07:17AM
(#44471914)
> and large parts of the drive haven't been read from for a long time
Hence the first sentence of my three sentence post.
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by dwedge on Saturday July 05, 2025 @09:15AM
(#44472596)
If I wanted to deal with snark I'd reply to people on Reddit.
Re:Mini NASes marry NVMe to Intel's efficient chip
by Dylan16807 on Saturday July 05, 2025 @03:58PM
(#44475109)
My goal isn't to be rude, but when you skip over a critical part of what I'm saying it causes a communication issue. Are you correcting my numbers, or intentionally giving numbers for a completely different scenario, or something in between? Is it none of those and you weren't taking my comment seriously enough to read 50 words? The way you replied made it hard to tell.