>Sounds like you and they are equally competent at finding sources.

Sounds like you're failing at basic reading comprehension, which isn't surprising. I am not the one who made the claim, I do not have to supply sources.

>It's not hard if you try.

Trying doesn't make a difference: the sources don't exist.

>I don't need to enable anyone's laziness.

You have too much laziness of your own, I get it. You're also insanely triggered by my basic asks (since they are heretical apparently) which similarly doesn't surprise me. Any reply from you is an admission that you're triggered and don't have any sources.

That's a lot of effort you spent trying to move goalposts to try to project your insecurities. :-)

Can I try?

Any reply from you is an admission that you're triggered and don't have any intelligence. Also failing to reply is an admission of the same.

>That's a lot of effort you spent trying to move goalposts to try to project your insecurities. :-)

Goalposts haven't moved, you've just missed.

>Can I try?

No you may not, so the rest of your post is disregarded. Bet you're seething over opening yourself up to that.

Any reply from you is an admission that you're triggered and don't have any intelligence. Also failing to reply is an admission of the same.

I won.

It's pretty sad that you decided to come back to this a week later, and it's also telling that the majority of your comment is just things I wrote.

Guess we're done now that you've decided you win though. "I'm bleeding, making me the victor!"

>It's pretty sad that you decided to come back to this a week later

Not at all, I have a real life and don't log in every day and furiously click refresh and go through all the comment threads unlike you because you're so triggered.

>and it's also telling that the majority of your comment is just things I wrote.

Modern day Sherlock you are.

>Guess we're done now that you've decided you win though. "I'm bleeding, making me the victor!"

Glad you admit defeat.

No, some of us just have apps that let us know when someone replies.

Whether you were logged in or not, the decision to reply to this thread after a week was the sad bit. But I'm here for you to let off whatever steam you need.

I can admit defeat more if that will help you? Or should I try to give you an opportunity to say "triggering intensifies"? Or something else? Just let me know what will let you feel better.

>No, some of us just have apps that let us know when someone replies.

Sad and cringe.

>Whether you were logged in or not, the decision to reply to this thread after a week was the sad bit.

Translation: "You're not as terminally online as I am and I think that's sad."

>I can admit defeat more if that will help you? Or should I try to give you an opportunity to say "triggering intensifies"? Or something else?

No need to admit more, it's done. You replyguying is more than enough admission.

>Just let me know what will let you feel better.

You coping and seething is enough. Sad.

I'm glad you're getting so much out of this. Would you like me to use a "can I" again as a rhetorical device so you can reply "No you may not" again? I promise I'll be devastated.