Re:Sam Altman Slams Meta's AI Talent Poaching: 'Missionaries...
by ryandrake on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @01:21AM
(#44440466)
We shouldn’t even be using the offensive word “poaching.” As an employee, I am not a deer or wild boar owned by a feudal lord by working for his company. And another employer isn’t some thief stealing me away. I have agency and control over who I enter into an employment arrangement with!
Re:Sam Altman Slams Meta's AI Talent Poaching: 'Missionaries...
by jaza on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @01:40AM
(#44440542)
So then, is "headhunting" more or less bad?
Re:Sam Altman Slams Meta's AI Talent Poaching: 'Missionaries...
by ryandrake on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @01:45AM
(#44440565)
I think anything that evokes “hunting on someone else’s land for his property” is equally inappropriate.
Re:Sam Altman Slams Meta's AI Talent Poaching: 'Missionaries...
by jack_riminton on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @02:29AM
(#44440774)
Would "bought" be better then? implies slavery!
Re:Sam Altman Slams Meta's AI Talent Poaching: 'Missionaries...
by vasco on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @07:41AM
(#44442482)
There's a word for this, it's called being hired.
Re:Sam Altman Slams Meta's AI Talent Poaching: 'Missionaries...
by saubeidl on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @09:06AM
(#44443271)
"Making a more competitive offer"
Re:Sam Altman Slams Meta's AI Talent Poaching: 'Missionaries...
by chaosharmonic on Wednesday July 02, 2025 @10:54AM
(#44444524)
I don't disagree with this either -- it's very clearly just a free market working both ways.
It also immediately reminds me of the no-call agreements companies had with each other last decade 10 or 15yrs ago.
The problem with the argument is that most places saying this are paying more like a sub-basement, not that there can't genuinely be more important things.
That said, Sam Altman is also a guy who stuck nondisparagement terms into their equity agreement... and in that same vein, framing poaching as "someone has broken into our home" reads like cult language.