Re:Better Auth, a TypeScript authentication library, raises ...
by figassis on Thursday June 26, 2025 @02:25AM
(#44384697)
This is a market created by the supabases and it’s no code cousins. I frankly always considered auth so simple and fundamental, with best practices so well known that I never saw the need to use a SaaS for user auth. I guess if you want to offer all the auth methods that this library is useful and saves a lot of time.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Better Auth, a TypeScript authentication library, raises ...
by shreezus on Thursday June 26, 2025 @03:02AM
(#44384925)
As someone who has been at a company where for various reasons, we decided to "roll our own auth", I would have to disagree here. Don't reinvent the wheel if you can avoid doing so.
Re:Better Auth, a TypeScript authentication library, raises ...
by jtms on Friday June 27, 2025 @01:14PM
(#44398510)
I would never suggest "roll your own", but every web framework I have ever used generally has a library that is the go to battle tested auth implementation and just requires adding a few columns and/or tables to your database.
Re:Better Auth, a TypeScript authentication library, raises ...
by sc0rpil on Thursday June 26, 2025 @02:47AM
(#44384829)
Absolutely wild take. Auth is most definitely not simple, nor are best practices well known, based on number of auth-related vulnerabilities published.
Re:Better Auth, a TypeScript authentication library, raises ...
by TheCapeGreek on Thursday June 26, 2025 @11:34AM
(#44388407)
I guess everyone outside of the JS ecosystem, that has auth baked into the framework for decades, is just doing it wrong and riddled with hackers in their systems?