QEMU: Define policy forbidding use of AI code generators

Re:QEMU: Define policy forbidding use of AI code generators by OptionOfT on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @10:03PM (#44383594)

Same here. You throw a question in a channel. Someone responds in 1 minute with a code example that either you had laying around, or would take > 5 minutes to write.

The code example was AI generated. I couldn't find a single line of code anywhere in any codebase. 0 examples on GitHub.

And of course it didn't work.

But, it sent me on a wild goose because I trusted this person to give me a valuable insight. It pisses me off so much.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:QEMU: Define policy forbidding use of AI code generators by mailund on Thursday June 26, 2025 @08:43AM (#44386873)

I experienced mentioning an issue I was stuck on during standup one day, then some guy on my team DMs me a screenshot of chatGPT with text about how to solve the issue. When I explained to him why the solution he had sent me didn't make sense and wouldn't solve the issue, he sent me back the reply the LLM would give by pasting in my reply, at which point I stopped responding.

I'm just really confused what people who send LLM content to other people think they are achieving? Like if I wanted an LLM response, I would just prompt the LLM myself, instead of doing it indirectly though another person who copy/pastes back and forth.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:QEMU: Define policy forbidding use of AI code generators by meindnoch on Friday June 27, 2025 @07:23AM (#44395884)

The appropriate response is giving these people an LLM-generated explanation on why sending people LLM-generated slop is inappropriate and provides zero value.

[ Parent | on HN ]