AGI is Mathematically Impossible 2: When Entropy Returns

Re:AGI is Mathematically Impossible 2: When Entropy Returns by haneul on Monday June 23, 2025 @02:56AM (#44353152)

> In plain language:

> No matter how sophisticated, the system MUST fail on some inputs.

Well, no person is immune to propaganda and stupididty, so I don't see it as a huge issue.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AGI is Mathematically Impossible 2: When Entropy Returns by amelius on Monday June 23, 2025 @03:29AM (#44353328)

But what then is the relevance of the study?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AGI is Mathematically Impossible 2: When Entropy Returns by haneul on Monday June 23, 2025 @03:34AM (#44353352)

I suppose it disproves embodied, fully meat-space god if sound?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AGI is Mathematically Impossible 2: When Entropy Returns by amelius on Monday June 23, 2025 @03:50AM (#44353405)

I'm looking at the title again and it seems wrong, because AGI ~ human intelligence. Unless human intelligence has non physical components to it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AGI is Mathematically Impossible 2: When Entropy Returns by vidarh on Monday June 23, 2025 @04:26AM (#44353570)

I have no idea how you believe this relates to the comment you replied to.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AGI is Mathematically Impossible 2: When Entropy Returns by harimau777 on Monday June 23, 2025 @07:15AM (#44354494)

If I'm understanding correctly, they are arguing that the paper only requires that an intelligent system will fail for some inputs and suggest that things like propaganda are inputs for which the human intelligent system fails. Therefore, they are suggesting that the human intelligent system does not necessarily refute the paper's argument.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AGI is Mathematically Impossible 2: When Entropy Returns by vidarh on Monday June 23, 2025 @07:32AM (#44354631)

If so, then the papers argument isn't actually trying to prove that AGI is impossible, despite the title, and the entire discussion is pointless.

[ Parent | on HN ]