News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by piva00 on Thursday June 19, 2025 @05:13AM (#44316824)
This comparison doesn't make sense, the USD 200B/year was to invent the capabilities, do trailblazing work on something that needed to be proven even feasible as a concept, to do fundamental/foundational work, not to productionalise technology.

I'd expect SpaceX to do much more now than NASA in the 60s if granted USD 200B/year, considering they are already standing on the shoulders of giants.

Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by Aeolun on Thursday June 19, 2025 @06:26PM (#44323105)
Well sure, but they don’t have 200b a year. They’re doing more with (much) less.