Meta's Llama 3.1 can recall 42 percent of the first Harry Potter book

Re:Meta's Llama 3.1 can recall 42 percent of the first Harry... by imgabe on Monday June 16, 2025 @01:49AM (#44286921)

Millions? No, but my brain certainly consumed thousands of books, movies, TV shows, pieces of music, artworks, and other copyrighted material. Where is the cutoff? Can I only consume 999,999 copyrighted works before I'm not longer allowed to remember something without infringing copyright? My brain definitely would not exist in its current form without consuming that material. It would exist in some form, but it would without a doubt be different than it is having consumed the material.

An LLM is not a person and does not deserve any rights. People have rights, including the right to use tools like LLMs without having to grease the palm of every grubby rights holder (or their great-great-grandchild) just because it turns out their work was so trite and predictable it could be reproduced by simply guessing the next most likely token.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Meta's Llama 3.1 can recall 42 percent of the first Harry... by em-bee on Monday June 16, 2025 @03:21AM (#44287322)

i can remember and i can quote, but if i quote to much i violate the copyright.

this is literally why i don't like to work on proprietary code. because when i need to create a similar solution for someone else i have to go out of my way to make sure i do it differently. people have been sued over this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Meta's Llama 3.1 can recall 42 percent of the first Harry... by bakugo on Monday June 16, 2025 @02:38AM (#44287129)

> just because it turns out their work was so trite and predictable it could be reproduced by simply guessing the next most likely token.

Well, if you have no idea how LLMs work, you could've just said so.

[ Parent | on HN ]