Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not just a design refresh

Re:Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not ... by sheepscreek on Friday June 13, 2025 @07:37PM (#44273197)

When discussing disasters, it’s impossible to ignore BlackBerry. They crafted solid devices, and their downfall from a hardware company is a tragic one. They grew too big and failed to adapt in times of “war” with a diminishing market share. However, I firmly believe they could have maintained a loyal user base over the years, at least large enough to allow them to fight another day.

Their user interface was a true gem - beautiful yet functional. The devices were incredibly fast, and the optical cursor was a revelation. I genuinely believe the way the trackpad cursor functions on the iPad is inspired by BlackBerry’s design.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not ... by zeroq on Friday June 13, 2025 @08:29PM (#44273387)

I always think about BlackBerry as another Kodak.

They owned their space in their time, nothing came close, and then, one day, times have changed and their product become obsolete. I don't blame them.

It's cool to sit on HN and think everyone should pivot on a yearly basis, but in reality it rarely happens for companies that big. It takes a lot of time and effort to change to course of a tanker ship, and when you're in position that you have a product that is precisely on point, competition can't touch you, the most reasonable thing to do is just not to fuck things up... and then it's too late. Sometimes. Most of the time it's the winning strategy.

If anything, Nokia was distaster.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not ... by Dylan16807 on Saturday June 14, 2025 @01:51AM (#44274500)

I blame them. When you have that kind of money you can not fuck things up and invent new things.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not ... by sumedh on Sunday June 15, 2025 @04:26AM (#44281234)

Its difficult for leadership when you are already making billions to change ship, if you are the guy who proposes it, gets approval to work on it then executes and if the plan fails you are probably out of that cushy job.

So it makes sense not to rock the boat.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not ... by zdragnar on Friday June 13, 2025 @09:22PM (#44273572)

My only experience with BB was awful, though it was at the perfectly wrong time. I was responsible for developing an app for the Storm and it was really the worst of both worlds.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not ... by jitl on Friday June 13, 2025 @09:45PM (#44273653)

Storm was so funny to me. My lawyer older cousin got one excitedly and it felt like such a dinosaur compared to year old iPhones.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not ... by elictronic on Friday June 13, 2025 @09:59PM (#44273708)

The lawyers I knew wrote tons of emails. Touch screens of earlier iphones were just not as good for writing long formally worded replies.

It would be like trying to write code on an iPhone today.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not ... by jitl on Friday June 13, 2025 @10:04PM (#44273730)

The storm was virtual keyboard only, and a markedly worse one where you had to click in the whole screen. Worst aspect of touchscreen keyboard (finger placement, no keyfinding haptics, still need to look directly at it) with the added slowness of needing to click the biggest possible button - one the size of a whole phone.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple's Liquid Glass is prep work for AR interfaces, not ... by pwthornton on Friday June 13, 2025 @09:51PM (#44273683)

Storm was a very un-Blackberry phone and objectively awful. It should never have been released.

[ Parent | on HN ]