Changed the title FWIW

Er, why would I write an ad for Kagi? Nothing in it for me! I’m writing up some thoughts having used it for a couple of months. It’s what I do on my blog ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

for that sweet ad revenue

what are you talking about?

?

Maybe I'm easily deceived, but it looks exactly like what it porports to be to me - thoughts of someone with no affiliation to Kagi apart from being a paid customer after using it for two months.

Given he's used Google since the google.standford.edu days and his opinion of DDG match mine, this was interesting to read:

> search results - easily on-par with Google

Given how Microsoft has failed at that with Bing after 16 years of trying, that's an impressive achievement.

The title used to be "A review of Kagi search", while the article is not at all a review.

OP changed the title but not the article.