Re:Maximizing Battery Storage Profits via High-Frequency Int...
by eldaisfish on Thursday June 12, 2025 @01:29PM
(#44260328)
as with anything, it's not just money. Losing battery capacity in an EV is a hassle. A hassle because you charge more frequently, a hassle because you will eventually need a battery change, and so on. What is the price of all that hassle?
That said, most EV incentive programs use around 10% (often less) of an EV battery capacity so the actual effects are barely noticeable.
Re:Maximizing Battery Storage Profits via High-Frequency Int...
by crazygringo on Thursday June 12, 2025 @09:26PM
(#44264898)
> What is the price of all that hassle?
A price that can be measured in money. How much more does it need to pay to be worth any extra hassle?
So in a sense it is just money. Money is hassle, fundamentally. It's a hassle to make it and you spend it to save other hassles.
Re:Maximizing Battery Storage Profits via High-Frequency Int...
by Dylan16807 on Friday June 13, 2025 @12:13AM
(#44265665)
And since lots of EV batteries seem to lose capacity very slowly after the first 10-15%, and you can keep your battery trading in the happiest range, there's a lot of potential for the extra hassle to be worth the paycheck.
More battery cycles just costs money. For the right price, I'd do it.
But more than that: I don't want to be stranded without power in my vehicle because someone in the electric grid made poor power management decisions and decided to offload that decision to consumers.