Re:Kennedy guts CDC's vaccine panel of independent experts
by giardini on Monday June 09, 2025 @11:51PM
(#44232289)
That is a useful suggestion and I wish it were the practice here. But a request of "what RFK thinks" is honestly too broad to be useful. I read his book(1) and just that alone covers far, farm more than could be encompassed in an HN discussion.
Better to state what you argue or what you believe an opponent is arguing, so that a reasonable discussion can then ensue. IOW I agree with you that each of RFK's contentions could be discussed dispassionately here; in contrast mrtksn 55 minutes ago wrote:
+I like the suggestion, but this is not a debate really, this is action."
which, to me, sounds like some sort of (insurrectionist/Marxist/something I'm unfamiliar with) "call to action" rather than a consideration of further discussion. If so, then my imagined discussion would be likely impossible.
(1) "The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health"
Better to state what you argue or what you believe an opponent is arguing, so that a reasonable discussion can then ensue. IOW I agree with you that each of RFK's contentions could be discussed dispassionately here; in contrast mrtksn 55 minutes ago wrote:
+I like the suggestion, but this is not a debate really, this is action."
which, to me, sounds like some sort of (insurrectionist/Marxist/something I'm unfamiliar with) "call to action" rather than a consideration of further discussion. If so, then my imagined discussion would be likely impossible.
(1) "The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health"
https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Pharma-Democracy/d...