I’ve noticed a recurring theme on iOS where interactions intended for an app get trapped by the OS (especially multi-window interactions on iPad). The OS is less and less a foundation to support what you actually want, and more the product itself. If the actual content of the phones matters less than the fact that iOS itself is “the latest” then this makes perfect sense and is in line with the general momentum over the past several years.

Fully agree with your sentiment, and it was kinda sad to see the demo going there.

"And this is how easy I can replace this custom component with a new glass component...".

The whole thing is just wild.

There was plenty of UX enhancements which looked solid, but just for them to be paired with a design choice of N=1 elements is... well let's see if it pays off I guess?

What does autism have to do with it?

Check the parent comment.

Oh! I've long struggled with the narrow indents on Hacker News comments. I thought this was a reply to OP.

Thank you.

Autistic people tend to have very different sensory sensitivities than neurotypical people. Most are very highly sensitive and tend have trouble picking out a signal when there’s too much noise around it.

To me, being socially awkward is kind of a secondary, less important trait, but that’s the one everyone seems to notice. We’re weird on the outside because inside, we’re dealing with overwhelming sensory input.

Whoops, I didn't see parent comment and thought the reply was to the submission. It seemed massively out of context but absolutely wasn't :-)

Curse HackerNews' narrow indents!

>I fail to see any systematic approach/ consistent design language at play here.

O no, there is a systematic approach.

1. Bosses in UI division get promotions & raises for their new implementation of shiny

2. Marketing guys get to use their bird brains to promote shiny

3. Apple UX guys get to have their med prescriptions renewed