What you need to know about EMP weapons

Re:What you need to know about EMP weapons by dragonwriter on Friday June 06, 2025 @06:13PM (#44205542)

> The text of article 5 doesn’t distinguish whether the attack on the NATO state was justified or even whether the NATO state attacked first.

Arguably, the text of Article 5 doesn't have to, since an act of aggression breaches the obligations of Articles 1 and 2, as well as the pre-existing obligations which the Treaty explicitly does not alter under Article 7.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:What you need to know about EMP weapons by spacebanana7 on Friday June 06, 2025 @06:49PM (#44205820)

I see what you mean - although articles 1 & 2 seem to be treated more like guidelines rather than rules.

Otherwise I struggle to understand how any NATO member could’ve engaged in any of the overt or covert expressions of military force in Iraq 2003, Vietnam, Cuba, Iran, Guatemala, Chile, Egypt, or Algeria to name but a few.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:What you need to know about EMP weapons by rjsw on Saturday June 07, 2025 @11:49AM (#44210422)

None of the conflicts you list were NATO actions.

[ Parent | on HN ]