Re:Decreasing Gitlab repo backup times from 48 hours to 41 m...
by immortaljoe on Friday June 06, 2025 @01:22PM
(#44203060)
OP here. Feedback is always welcome, I did mean exponentially in the colloquial sense. I do see how it is confusing here, will change it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Decreasing Gitlab repo backup times from 48 hours to 41 m...
by serial_dev on Friday June 06, 2025 @03:05PM
(#44203970)
You can’t use exponentially in the colloquial sense in a post about software performance.
If my barista says that his new coffee is exponentially better, it’s ok to use it colloquially.
If my git hosting provider writes about an impactful performance improvement, it’s not.
Re:Decreasing Gitlab repo backup times from 48 hours to 41 m...
by DamonHD on Friday June 06, 2025 @01:26PM
(#44203099)
Thank you.
(I don't think that anyone should use "exponentially" that way: it is an art term with a specific and particular meaning, so find another word if you mean something else! Like misusing specific legal or sporting terms...)
Re:Decreasing Gitlab repo backup times from 48 hours to 41 m...
by ctxc on Friday June 06, 2025 @01:41PM
(#44203251)
Art term?
Re:Decreasing Gitlab repo backup times from 48 hours to 41 m...
by ctxc on Friday June 06, 2025 @02:03PM
(#44203443)
Ah, thanks. I could only think of art as in literal, artistic art.
Re:Decreasing Gitlab repo backup times from 48 hours to 41 m...
by kccqzy on Friday June 06, 2025 @02:29PM
(#44203649)
If you have that tendency, you just need to think of TAOCP, this industry's best distillation of intellectual achievement, with the word "art" in its name.
Re:Decreasing Gitlab repo backup times from 48 hours to 41 m...
by taftster on Friday June 06, 2025 @04:42PM
(#44204763)
Which term is appropriate here? What would you suggest? (honest question)
Re:Decreasing Gitlab repo backup times from 48 hours to 41 m...
by DamonHD on Saturday June 07, 2025 @03:18AM
(#44208026)
"hugely" or "a lot" or "to O(XXX)" whatever the new XXX complexity is.