News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Self-hosting your own media considered harmful according ... by brigandish on Friday June 06, 2025 @06:13AM (#44199378)
Herd immunity is not a direct goal of vaccination, protection of the individual being vaccinated is. If someone needs protection, then they should get vaccinated!
Re:Self-hosting your own media considered harmful according ... by ekianjo on Friday June 06, 2025 @06:28AM (#44199459)
Then why did we ask small kids to be vaccinated for COVID when they had no serious risk of anything? Rhetorical question, of course.
Re:Self-hosting your own media considered harmful according ... by Imustaskforhelp on Friday June 06, 2025 @08:13AM (#44200055)
I am not sure about America but in India, I was a child during covid, 7th grade - 8th grade and i didn't have a vaccine but my school students just one grade above us were called in school and they were asked for vaccine.

Though, to be fair, my whole family caught a "virus" during 2nd phase except my father but we didn't go to hospital and just bed rest for 2-3 days. My family really were skeptical of vaccine but personally I don't mind vaccines and would prefer it.

Re:Self-hosting your own media considered harmful according ... by protonbob on Friday June 06, 2025 @08:10AM (#44200033)
Even more, why did we REQUIRE them to be vaccinated for COVID.
Re:Self-hosting your own media considered harmful according ... by aleph_minus_one on Friday June 06, 2025 @06:38AM (#44199518)
> Then why did we ask small kids to be vaccinated for COVID when they had no serious risk of anything?

Think of the children ... :-)

Re:Self-hosting your own media considered harmful according ... by brigandish on Friday June 06, 2025 @11:18PM (#44207146)
On the contrary, for the overwhelming majority of children you're absolutely right, they didn't have serious risk from COVID-19, which makes your question a good one, not a rhetorical one.

Regardless, herd immunity was not a serious possibility at any point (given the high Rº and lack of a vaccine that could prevent transmission), which, considering this was known very early on makes your question, again, a good one not a rhetorical one, despite your intent.

Finally, regardless of herd immunity, at risk individuals would still require vaccination, which makes the herd immunity as a goal, again, irrelevant, which is where I started. It's a nice by-product.