Human coders are still better than LLMs

Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by asdff on Thursday June 05, 2025 @03:05PM (#44194771)

Seems that aiming twice and shooting once is a good thing when the cost of a miss is destabilizing someones entire personal life for their entire family potentially

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by npteljes on Thursday June 05, 2025 @03:40PM (#44195069)

I fail to see the issue with that as well.

The sentiment I often see online is that "fewer rules = more freedom". And as I grew more experienced, I find that the opposite is true. In a lot of cases, freedom is upheld by the rules themselves. And this is not an orwellian "war is peace" kind of thing, but rather a GNU Free Software kind of thing, where the perpetuity of the freedom is guaranteed with the rules of participation.

I think that this discussion went in the same direction with the unions. But, of course, freedom in itself can have different interpretations for different people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by twodave on Saturday June 14, 2025 @04:02PM (#44278471)

If you know of a reliable way to do this then you should go sell it right now, because nobody in tech has figured this out yet.

[ Parent | on HN ]