News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cursor 1.0 by fragmede on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:21AM (#44189562)
Claude Code (and Cursor, for that matter) don't commit to git. Fundamentally that's just bonkers to me. Aider does, so each prompt can be /undo'd. I had a chance to use Cursor at work, and if that's how people are interacting with LLMs, it's no wonder we can't agree on this whole "are LLMs useful for programming" thing.

ChatGPT Codex is on another level for agentic workflow though. It's been released to (some?) "plus" ($20/month) subscribers. I could do the same thing manually by making a new terminal, making a new git worktree, and firing up another copy of aider, but the way codex does it is so smooth.

Re:Cursor 1.0 by sneak on Thursday June 05, 2025 @07:53AM (#44190715)
Cursor can commit just fine if you tell it.
Re:Cursor 1.0 by koakuma-chan on Thursday June 05, 2025 @06:11AM (#44190141)
C.C. can commit if you ask it
Re:Cursor 1.0 by floydnoel on Thursday June 05, 2025 @06:53AM (#44190364)
it did tons of commits when i started to have a really big session yesterday, and i didn't even have to ask!
Re:Cursor 1.0 by amirhirsch on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:27AM (#44189594)
MCP for Claude code that asks ChatGPT O3 for help. This is the way.
Re:Cursor 1.0 by carefulfungi on Thursday June 05, 2025 @08:37AM (#44191075)
I haven't used Jujutsu / jj much at all. But it seems like a great match to Aider. I wonder how the surrounding dev tooling ecosystem changes as agentic coders become more popular.