Re:Tesla seeks to guard crash data from public disclosure
by fastball on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:05AM
(#44189465)
I literally rebutted that context. Waymos are not safe autonomous driving today, they have caused various safety issues in the era of "today". I didn't include "today" in my original comment because none of the available options are "the only true safe way to do it today", but I don't think it is constructive to just say that.
No True Scotsman was obviously in reference to GC, not you.
Re:Tesla seeks to guard crash data from public disclosure
by Dylan16807 on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:22AM
(#44189570)
"Waymos are not safe" could be a rebuttal to what they said. "There are many safe humans" is not a rebuttal to what they said. Your comment above was the latter.
> No True Scotsman was obviously in reference to GC, not you.
I'm unsure what they said that would qualify. Was it adding "true unsupervised"? I think that's a fair qualification, because most of the point of self driving is lost if I can't look away from the road.
The gap between humans and computers is enormous, not some weird gotcha tactic.