Ok, thank you for that point, I responded by pointing out that using LLM's is a skill and that if you get better at it, instead of getting "confidently incorrect" output, you get "well researched accurate output".
This is like a conversation where your entire point is "a hammer can very easily break your thumb" and my point is "a hammer is a versatile tool in skillful hands.
I think it's a normal and rational expansion of a conversation where a newbie to a trade points out a danger, than someone with more experience assuages their fears and teaches them how to do it properly.
My point is: LLMs sound very plausible and very confident when they are wrong.
That’s it. And I was just offering a trick to help remembering this, to keep checking their output – nothing else.