Sure - a destination is "local" if your machine has a route to that IP which isn't via a gateway.
If your network is large enough that it consists of multiple routed network segments, and you don't have any ACLs between those segments, then yeah, you won't be fully protected by this browser feature. But you aren't protected right now either, so nothing's getting worse, it's just not getting better for your specific use case.
Fantastic. Well, Google doesn't agree
The proposal defines it along RFC1918 address space boundaries. The spitballing back and forth in the GitHub issues about which imaginary TLDs they will or won't also consider "local" is absolutely horrifying.
Quote: We extend the RFC 1918 concept of private IP addresses to build a model of network privacy.
Concretely, there are 3 kinds of private network requests:
public -> private
public -> local
private -> localSomehow this hasn't been a 'massive security risk' for the last 35 years but suddenly is in 2025?
Honestly a much bigger problem is sites like Yelp making nearly every link on their mobile site a phony redirect to the App Store. That shit is infuriating and a much bigger real world problem.