News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon Glacier by chmars on Wednesday August 22, 2012 @05:43AM (#4416648)
In an earlier version of Arq, there was no possibility to see which data was actually selected for backup (and which not). Has Arq become more user-friendly?
Re:Amazon Glacier by ghshephard on Wednesday August 22, 2012 @04:29PM (#4419411)
I'm a current user of ARQ, and it has, in my opinion (compared to Backblaze) a phenomenally user friendly description of exactly what is being backed up, and when, and when something was added, or modified.