Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by wvenable on Thursday May 29, 2025 @10:21PM
(#44132208)
I don't know how someone can legitimately say that they're useless. Perfect, no. But useless, also no.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> I don't know how someone can legitimately say that they're useless.
Clearly, statistical models trained on this HN thread would output that sequence of tokens with high probability. Are you suggesting that a statement being probable in a text corpus is not a legitimate source of truth? Can you generalize that a little bit?