News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by suddenlybananas on Thursday May 29, 2025 @06:06PM (#44130850)
Why not just write the code at that point instead of cajoling an AI to do it.
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by XorNot on Thursday May 29, 2025 @06:45PM (#44131097)
This is the part I don't get about vibe coding: I've written specification documents before. They frequently are longer and denser then the code required to implement them.

Typing longer and longer prompts to LLMs to not get what I want seems like a worse experience.

Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by skydhash on Friday May 30, 2025 @08:08AM (#44135370)
Code is a concise notation for specifications, one that is unambiguous. The reason we write specs in natural language is that it's more easier to alter when the requirements change and easier to read. Also code is tainted by accidental complexities that they're also solving.
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by lupire on Thursday May 29, 2025 @06:47PM (#44131110)
Because saving hours of time is nice.
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs by all2 on Thursday May 29, 2025 @09:21PM (#44131905)
I don't cajole the model to do it. I rarely use what the model generates. I typically do my own thing after making an assessment of what the model writes. I orient myself in the problem space with the model, then use my knowledge to write a more concise solution.