Re:Comprehensive Analysis of De-Anonymization Attacks Agains...
by OsrsNeedsf2P on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @12:17PM
(#44117664)
How much of the Monero development team is actually known? Last I checked some of their core team were anonymous but that might have changed
Re:Comprehensive Analysis of De-Anonymization Attacks Agains...
by MoneroDotForex on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @01:13PM
(#44118243)
Proven but pseudonymous, like Satoshi was.
Adopted and used first by darkweb pot dealers, like Bitcoin was.
Price supressed by government and banking hostility, like Bitcoin was.
Re:Comprehensive Analysis of De-Anonymization Attacks Agains...
by arccy on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @12:42PM
(#44117871)
known as in have a proven reputation / track record.
Re:Comprehensive Analysis of De-Anonymization Attacks Agains...
by DaSHacka on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @12:14PM
(#44117624)
The latter is arguably the more important of the two.
I remember a scare some years back around a Monero developer that turned out to be a nothingburger, but it goes to show how important it is that the core development team is trustworthy, or at least sticks to their beliefs and don't capitulate to third-parties (whether public or private in nature).
Monero is the one coin I can confidently say I trust the core developers on, it's had a strong history of making the right decisions where it counts in my opinion (breaking ASICs w/the monero-classic situation, making the official client default to downloading the entire chain, etc)
No one wants to switch to some unknown tech with an unknown development team.