I'm not sure I agree. The first few sections are clear, concise, supported by links to observations you expect, and cover exactly what you say is missing:

> THE PROBLEM

> THE CURRENT, PASSIVE, ANSWER

> AN ALTERNATIVE, ACTIVE, ANSWER

> A MORE FRUGAL ANSWER

> SUPPORTIVE EVIDENCE

Here's a direct link to that last section:

https://theeggandtherock.com/i/158515951/supportive-evidence

Edit: Alright, as I get further into the article I see more and more what you're mentioning...