Re:Apple Is Not The Most Valuable Company In The History Of ...
by mpd on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @01:53AM
(#4411345)
I'm curious where Standard Oil would stand had it not been broken up.
Re:Apple Is Not The Most Valuable Company In The History Of ...
by ximeng on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @01:57AM
(#4411356)
$1tn according to Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil#Breakup
Re:Apple Is Not The Most Valuable Company In The History Of ...
by chmars on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @03:12AM
(#4411515)
PetroChina was actually worth more than one billion USD a few years ago when a-shares became available at the Shanghai Stock Exchange.
Re:Apple Is Not The Most Valuable Company In The History Of ...
by ximeng on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @04:52AM
(#4411788)
You mean trillion I think.
Re:Apple Is Not The Most Valuable Company In The History Of ...
by Luc on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @08:55AM
(#4412445)
A long-scale billion is a short-scale trillion. How I hate this confusion! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales
Re:Apple Is Not The Most Valuable Company In The History Of ...
by chmars on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @11:14AM
(#4413025)
Thanks, I never know which one to use if a use English with a mixed audience.
Re:Apple Is Not The Most Valuable Company In The History Of ...
by chmars on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @08:50AM
(#4412420)
In numbers, I mean 10^12. As a written word, you are right that for most HN readers, trillion is the probably the correct term.
Re:Apple Is Not The Most Valuable Company In The History Of ...
by henrikschroder on Tuesday August 21, 2012 @04:47AM
(#4411767)
I get so annoyed when people don't make (or understand) the distinction between the value of a company, public or private, and the market cap of a publicly traded company. They are not the same, not by a long-shot, and the biggest and most "valuable" companies are usually private.
http://blogs.mccombs.utexas.edu/titman/2010/03/01/more-thoug...