Re:Accidentally discovered nanostructured material passively...
by Aardwolf on Monday May 26, 2025 @06:03PM
(#44102102)
If something breaks the laws of physics it simply means the laws of physics were incomplete, so we update them and now it no longer breaks them
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Accidentally discovered nanostructured material passively...
by danaris on Monday May 26, 2025 @07:24PM
(#44102564)
However, if something claims to break the laws of physics, 99 times out of 100, it simply means that either a) the person making the claim missed something, or b) the person making the claim is lying.
Re:Accidentally discovered nanostructured material passively...
by shermantanktop on Monday May 26, 2025 @07:31PM
(#44102609)
Or c) the person making the claim has no interest in the truth, but strong interest in some other thing.
Re:Accidentally discovered nanostructured material passively...
by passwordoops on Tuesday May 27, 2025 @06:39AM
(#44105614)
Which is the same as b)
Don't complicate
Re:Accidentally discovered nanostructured material passively...
by therein on Monday May 26, 2025 @06:34PM
(#44102292)
It is really as simple as that and even applies to soon what will seem like free energy. It is not free energy, it is just energy from a field we were previously ignoring and previously fighting against.
Re:Accidentally discovered nanostructured material passively...
by cassianoleal on Monday May 26, 2025 @07:17PM
(#44102504)
What is the source of this seemingly free energy that we've been ignoring and fighting against (I assume at different points in time)?
Re:Accidentally discovered nanostructured material passively...
by yencabulator on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @12:37PM
(#44117814)
For example, Earth's magnetic field has been claimed as a source of "free" energy.