I was responding to “the converse: something that seems clumsily written will usually have gotten the ideas wrong too.”
About the nobel prize quote, it isn’t that powerful to me because I don’t really know what it wants to say, and it didn’t lead me to any notable insight either. But maybe that’s just me.
Re:Good Writing
by saltwatercowboy on Saturday May 24, 2025 @01:24PM
(#44082467)
Perhaps one sniff test for bad writing is presence of a link to the Wikipedia page for rhetoric.
About the nobel price quote: it shows that the most powerful language is unexpected, breaks the obviousness of things, something that ancient greeks knew very well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetoric