News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Good Writing by antirez on Saturday May 24, 2025 @12:13PM (#44081997)
Sure, it's not a 1:1 map, but often who does an excellent job, does it along all the line: form, content, and the best papers are even shorter normally... They don't have to justify with many pages the lack of real content.

About the nobel price quote: it shows that the most powerful language is unexpected, breaks the obviousness of things, something that ancient greeks knew very well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetoric

Re:Good Writing by layer8 on Saturday May 24, 2025 @12:17PM (#44082023)
I was responding to “the converse: something that seems clumsily written will usually have gotten the ideas wrong too.”

About the nobel prize quote, it isn’t that powerful to me because I don’t really know what it wants to say, and it didn’t lead me to any notable insight either. But maybe that’s just me.

Re:Good Writing by saltwatercowboy on Saturday May 24, 2025 @01:24PM (#44082467)
Perhaps one sniff test for bad writing is presence of a link to the Wikipedia page for rhetoric.
Re:Good Writing by antirez on Saturday May 24, 2025 @01:30PM (#44082521)
Pontiggia sometimes explained parts of other writers just using rethoric figures, and showing how their application provided new insights into things and concepts.