Yep and those people can never 'win' against current llms, let alone future ones. Outside motorcontrol which I specifically excluded.

85 is special housing where I live... LLMs are far beyond that now.

I'm not convinced this is true. I suspect that they'd mostly fail a version of Ravens matrices that didn't appear in the training set.

How are you living such that you're regularly pitting humans against computers

Not only is this unbelievable, it's reprehensible

> but most people <=100 iq

> average intelligence is 100

You both are saying the same thing.

IQ is defined such that both average and mean would be equal 100. The combination of sub-100 and exactly-100 would be more people than above-100, hence "most people <=100 iq".

Both average and mean, you say.

Oops, I meant both median and mean.

Frankly I have no clue what value the term "average" has after trying to follow this conversation.