Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a...
by giantg2 on Sunday May 18, 2025 @01:01PM
(#44022715)
Yeah, but I'm questioning what the opposition is to them paying wholesale rates. Like why is there opposition to that amendment?
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a...
by roenxi on Sunday May 18, 2025 @01:03PM
(#44022734)
Literally? Because then the people with rooftop solar will have less money. It is like asking why there is opposition to a 1% increase/decrease in taxes. Any change will face stiff opposition from some interest group.
Is that the big deal? It looks like the big deal is that utilities are being forced to buy energy at a higher-than-market price. If it wasn't legally required there is no way they would be paying retail prices for solar. It'd be like a supermarket paying retail prices to buy their stock - they can't make money if they buy at retail prices, sell at retail prices and have overheads of doing business.
That is a lot of money they're talking about. Such things are big deals.