News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by amazingamazing on Sunday May 18, 2025 @12:26PM (#44022475)
Seems better to give the money to electricity providers to install solar panels as solar farms and force them to discount electricity rates based off pre calculated solar electricity yield.
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by Loughla on Sunday May 18, 2025 @01:05PM (#44022754)
I do not want the legislature setting my power costs. That's absolutely a recipe for disaster.

Let me put in solar to lower my costs and let the solar company put in solar to lower their costs if they want. Then they can pass the savings on to me (ha ha).

Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by amazingamazing on Sunday May 18, 2025 @10:18PM (#44026028)
Most utility companies in USA are already regulated regarding pricing
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by firesteelrain on Sunday May 18, 2025 @01:07PM (#44022772)
Sounds plausible but reality is the utilities may not pass discounts down to consumers or the savings won’t be realized. Ideally decentralized solar gives individual users control and back to the consumer. The land required for solar farms usually is far from the actual consumer and requires long transmission lines.
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by amazingamazing on Sunday May 18, 2025 @01:33PM (#44022979)
Yes, that’s why any money given would be conditional like I mentioned…
Re:Solar grants held hostage in Pennsylvania legislature – a... by firesteelrain on Sunday May 18, 2025 @01:51PM (#44023112)
It’s not really feasible in reality