Re:The Academic Pipeline Stall: Why Industry Must Stand for ...
by generic92034 on Monday May 12, 2025 @04:43AM
(#43960889)
Maybe abrasion creating dust to be inhaled by humans makes the difference here.
Re:The Academic Pipeline Stall: Why Industry Must Stand for ...
by roenxi on Monday May 12, 2025 @04:54AM
(#43960965)
It's plausible, but I think the experience thus far is any dust in the lungs is a health risk. Asbestos will not be soon forgotten.
I'd be more worried about testing phosphogypsum's mechanical properties before anyone starts testing the radioactive ones. And danger relative to tyre rubber; although that has probably already been studied somewhere since it is an obvious thing to check.
Re:The Academic Pipeline Stall: Why Industry Must Stand for ...
by ben_w on Monday May 12, 2025 @04:54AM
(#43960964)
I expect it to — roads wear down and need resurfacing often enough, and that stuff has to go somewhere, either into the air as dust or dissolved in the rain and run off into the soil.
- Florida is using photogypsum - https://www.ijpr.org/npr-news/2023-06-30/florida-moves-forwa...
- Photogypsum in the US is banned if it radiates at >0.4 Bq/g of 226 Ra. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphogypsum
- Granite radiates at maybe 450 Bq/kg -> 0.45 Bq/g of 226 Ra. https://www.nature.com/articles/jes200944
So it looks like we're dealing with pretty standard rock. If this stuff was going to be banned without special permitting it is probably a little more risky than a granite kitchen-top counter if someone goes and sits on the road all day. Although this all raises the question of whether granite should be legal as a building material given that people get twitchy about this stuff - I doubt anyone can prove that granite is safe in this context.