News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Plain Vanilla Web by coolcase on Sunday May 11, 2025 @03:49PM (#43956549)
Nothing wrong with Flash and Silverlight except each being controlled by a single company. I liked those technologies. Adobe Flex was very nice to program in and use for it's time.
Re:Plain Vanilla Web by sofixa on Sunday May 11, 2025 @04:50PM (#43957047)
Both were absurdly slow and resource intensive.
Re:Plain Vanilla Web by cosmic_cheese on Sunday May 11, 2025 @08:00PM (#43958332)
Nothing got my old iMac G5 whipped into a frenzy like loading a page that had Flash on it somewhere. I’m not kidding when I say that there were many areas in World of Warcraft, a full-fat seamless open world 3D MMORPG, that didn’t make its fans as angry as Flash could manage to.

I was so happy when it finally started to disappear. That kind of sheer disregard for my system resources is inexcusable.

Re:Plain Vanilla Web by roywiggins on Sunday May 11, 2025 @08:21PM (#43958447)
I wonder what could have been if it had had the same effort applied to optimize it as JavaScript did.
Re:Plain Vanilla Web by cosmic_cheese on Sunday May 11, 2025 @08:53PM (#43958643)
It probably could’ve been great, but unfortunately such a thing would’ve been unlikely at best with Flash being solely controlled by Adobe. Not only does that company have a disinclination towards optimization that persists to this day, but with there having been no alternative implementations of Flash, there was no possibility of other organizations taking up that torch or for there to be competition between implementations driving things forward.
Re:Plain Vanilla Web by coolcase on Sunday May 11, 2025 @05:20PM (#43957251)
My experience circa. 2008/9 was it was fine (used it on a commercial app in lieu of good enough web standards for the featureset). It was fast and reactive for an app-like experience.

Games were made in flash so it can't be that slow.

Maybe slow for time to load. I think we got that down a bit and this wasn't to render content but a utility for a signed up user.

Re:Plain Vanilla Web by SoftTalker on Sunday May 11, 2025 @11:21PM (#43959340)
It was OK on Windows. It sucked on any other platform. And it was a security disaster.
Re:Plain Vanilla Web by ab5tract on Sunday May 11, 2025 @05:34PM (#43957353)
Flash was a lot of things, but also, at the same time, neither of these things. (You could come across poorly coded and thus poorly performing apps, but that wasn’t the standard).

Modern day SPAs are far, far worse offenders when it comes to smothering resources.

Re:Plain Vanilla Web by pwdisswordfishz on Monday May 12, 2025 @01:10AM (#43959833)
Just like browsers now.
Re:Plain Vanilla Web by mejutoco on Monday May 12, 2025 @07:11AM (#43961740)
The flash player leaked memory. The longer-running the app, the more noticeable it was. I believe this is why Adobe Air (flash player packaged as deliverable) failed.

As for the speed of the flash player itself it was quite good.

Re:Plain Vanilla Web by tomgp on Monday May 12, 2025 @11:53AM (#43964417)
They were resource intensive (though probably less so than yr average React based site these days) but Flash, especially post AS3, was an order of magnitude or two faster than JS + html/svg/canvas at the time. It was years after the death of Flash that standards based tech finally caught up.