Again, grow up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Exodus
"Most mainstream scholars do not accept the biblical Exodus account as historical for a number of reasons. It is generally agreed that the Exodus stories were written centuries after the apparent setting of the stories."
"However, a majority of scholars believe that the story has an historical core,[12][13] though disagreeing widely about what that historical kernel might have been."
I am not a scholar, however given just how many tribes Egyptians subjugated, and just how syncretic much of the early Israelite religion was, it's certainly not unreasonable to think that there was at least some group of people which had a "fleeing from Egypt" story which did later get subsumed into the Israelite religion.
There is absolutely no record of any slave 'race' of any Canaanites in Ancient Egypt, no kind of exodus, nor any kind of major event in that time period that could lead to such an exodus. The closest that could simulate an 'exodus' is the !likelihood! of some Canaanite people who may have come with the Hyksos in the Hyksos invasion going back to Canaan. Or, some local people who collaborated with the Hyksos, thinking that it could be better to go with them to avoid the ire of their own countrymen, who conquered Lower Egypt after 100 years.
People tried too hard to find anything in Ancient Egyptian history, records and events that could validate Moses, 'slave Semitics' and the exodus story, but until now, there is absolutely nothing. The most likely thing, if you try hard enough, could be the leaders of the people mentioned above, who may have potentially existed, inventing a 'promised land' story to persuade their people to go to Canaan. And even that is too big a stretch. The entire thing can easily be a mythology local Canaanites invented to justify their rights to the land without anything like it having happened.