Re:First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo...
by PaulHoule on Thursday May 08, 2025 @02:35PM
(#43929664)
I used to be a CNBC junkie. Before there was crypto I used to enjoy adopting a penny stock and watching the ticker for it very closely; you can learn a lot about market dynamics when you are trading a stock where you buy $2000 of stock and that is 30% of the volume for the day. (Try $KBLB for a stock where if you think the price is too high or too low you will find that both opinions are vindicated if you wait long enough.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo...
by Dylan16807 on Thursday May 08, 2025 @03:30PM
(#43930360)
And that's a million people doing that versus a billion people hearing about the pope.
(very very rough numbers of course)
Re:First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo...
by PaulHoule on Thursday May 08, 2025 @04:26PM
(#43930942)
Also those trades occurring "millions and millions" of times a day as opposed to a new pope every decade or so.
The comparison that I think matters is that the Pope and the Dalai Lama are the best-known religious leaders there are. I mean there used to be Billy Graham and the Ayatollah Khomeini but I think most people would struggle to name the leader of the Methodist church or Nichiren Buddhism or a rabbi of my than local importance.
Re:First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo...
by Dylan16807 on Thursday May 08, 2025 @04:45PM
(#43931141)
Is that supposed to affect the comparison? A million trades seen by a thousand people each* isn't impressive, and numbers like that happen in all kinds of situations.
This is about the huge number of people knowing about a single event right away.
* I say a thousand here because even someone glued to every number on CNBC is parsing nowhere near millions of numbers. A much smaller sliver of people will see each of those individual trades.
Re:First American pope elected and will be known as Pope Leo...
by crazygringo on Thursday May 08, 2025 @03:29PM
(#43930348)
That's great. Not sure what it has to do with the conversation though?
Nobody is claiming nobody follows stocks.