Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara...
by AstralStorm on Thursday May 08, 2025 @03:00AM
(#43923793)
It also introduces a lot of fragility into the ecosystem. If your TV fails (which does happen sometimes), you're suddenly without access to almost all features of the hardware? Unacceptable.
Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara...
by ralfd on Thursday May 08, 2025 @04:29AM
(#43924239)
Unacceptable? How often does that happen (> 10 years?) without one having an old computer lcd from 2016 as backup in the cellar? Or a dirt cheap mini hdmi 7-inch replacement ordered overnight on Amazon?
Aside my guess is the Apple TV does usually work “headless” in OP use case with music playing controlled from his phone. One only needs a tv for streaming video (obviously) and I think for initial setup.
Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara...
by greggsy on Thursday May 08, 2025 @04:41AM
(#43924289)
Exactly, people upgrade their telly years before they reach the end of their functional life
Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara...
by godzillabrennus on Thursday May 08, 2025 @07:51AM
(#43925241)
People are still buying and selling CRT tv’s for retro gaming so you are correct.
I'm not, honestly. Think of AVR-integrated radio receivers and hi-fi CD players: a typical appliance-grade (non-raster) VFD/LCD display is sufficient for navigating through radio stations and CD tracks; I will admit that Alexa-style voice-control can work quite well for online services like Spotify or Apple Music, but even then I find myself frequently needing to reach for my phone (and wait for Amazon's webview-based Echo app to load) for anything nontrivial.
While a good modern TV can show a picture from standby in a few seconds, it "feels wrong" to me to have to turn-on an eye-burningly-bright main living-room TV just to select a song to play.