News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by mcsniff on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @09:54PM (#43922375)
Sonarr, Radarr, Lidard are completely free, no ads, and private. Throw in JellyFin and Kodi and you're set -- no financial cost.
Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by wlesieutre on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @10:05PM (#43922436)
Which one of those replaces a Denon AV receiver to accept a bunch of inputs in various formats (HDMI, phono, optical, etc) including Dolby Atmos and ARC support to drive a multi-room 15.4 speaker system?
Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by moh_maya on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @11:44PM (#43922899)
You could perhaps consider looking at some of the class D amps coming out of CN. Remarkable stuff considering the price and power output.

SMSL has some good, well reviewed products; as do WiiM and quite a few other brands.

The Audio Science Review forum (1) has objective measurement based reviews of many of the newer amps, standalone and integrated.

I’m using the SMSL AO300 to drive Boston Acoustics VR3 floor standing speakers in a study, and they’re sound as good as they did when they were on an older Yamaha amp, or a Denon integrated amp.

Edited to add: most (none?) of the class D integrated amps can’t do Dolby -(licensing, I suspect, is the main issue here), so you’ll need to get a receiver in the middle for HTS though.

Edited post edit (sorry!): turns out Wiim streamers can now do 5.1, so some options are slowly emerging. (2)

(1) https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?forums/am...

(2) https://faq.wiimhome.com/en/support/solutions/articles/72000...

Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by iancmceachern on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @11:18PM (#43922761)
Get an integra pre amp or receiver
Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by timc3 on Thursday May 08, 2025 @12:59AM (#43923198)
Don’t think they are available outside the US.
Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by AdamJacobMuller on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @10:25PM (#43922533)
Just pick better brands for your receiver.

I have an Anthem pre and an LG TV, both of which are blocked from accessing the internet, and I have none of these issues.

Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by nirvdrum on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @11:24PM (#43922795)
I think the point is with Samsung acquiring these other brands there are now fewer options. Denon AVRs have been solid options for home theaters, particularly if you have many different inputs. People buy them because they want a Denon/Marantz. If they wanted to buy Samsung that option is already available. The concern is Samsung will mar the brands, removing semi-affordable, quality options and forcing people that don't want Samsung bloat into potentially even more expensive alternatives. You'd run into the same issue if Samsung acquired your audio equipment manufacturer of choice.
Re:Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Mara... by wlesieutre on Thursday May 08, 2025 @09:11AM (#43925792)
Yes, exactly. There are a couple of companies making home AV hardware. But not a lot of them. And across a lot of industries the different players are all getting gobbled up and turned shitty much faster than new competitors can replace them.