There's no morally superior actor here, unfortunately.
EDIT: There are many other strange things about the parent comment like why are you upset about the word "militant" instead of "terrorist"? They are functionally synonyms. What militant group isn't a terrorist group? And why is it opposite calling the BJP Hindu nationalist? It is a term they themselves coined and use to describe themselves??
EDIT 2: the original commenter is using a very cleverly edited clip from a different time period to support his claims. But watch the full clip and judge for yourselves. He is clearly referring to training the Afghan Mujahideen 3 decades ago, who the US also supported in the Soviet-Afghan War: https://youtube.com/shorts/lkO8fR4vlgA
Their defense minister admitted to it a few days ago to a Western Media channel.
Pakistan might be involved in this one, they might not be. I don't know. But that clip isn't evidence either way. He's quite insistent that Pakistan wasn't involved in the topical attacks. And indeed that the attacks may not have happened at all. He can't be admitting responsibility to something that he doesn't believe has happened done by groups he claims don't exist.
[0] Add some allowance for English apparently not being his native language - he was reiterating points from earlier in the interview.
Yes, just like how Pakistan was insistent about their involvement in sheltering Bin Laden. I don't understand why you expect any representative of a nation to confess explicitly to their crimes themselves but things like that just don't happen. Confession to their indirect involvement is the leading clue to majority of their actions and further investigation that will never be disclosed to public can only dig the truth.
>And indeed that the attacks may not have happened at all
that is very funny. That attack did happen and the attackers did send a message mentioning the name "Modi" to one of the survivors they spared. The tourists were stripped first to verify if they're circumcised and were shot immediately thereafter. I won't share further details but I ensure you, it really did happen and feel free to discard this as misinformation or dig further into it yourself.
So the expectation here is that in the video he admits that, and he does not.
Nobody expected that to be true, that was the whole point.
I'm sorry if I was rude by using the term delusional but given their behavior, that is what it seemed like to me to expect a confession from them.
We already know what happens when Islamic fanatics take over the army in Afghanistan/Iran/Lebanon/Gaza.
If the Muslim Brotherhood took over Egypt (and they did win the elections) instead of a US propped up Military Dictatorship that would just add another layer of chaos to the middle east.
Its not black and white. Plus all sides make mistakes cause the problem is way above everyones pay grade.
Really? OUt of 9 sites, 4 were inside Pakistan, targeting specific infrastructure.
While India is not interested in war, this attack is not just a "distraction".
The whole nation is wanting revenge on the massacre in Pahalgam, where militants from an islamic terrorist outfit, made men drop down their trousers (to check for circumcision which Hindus do not undergo), real the kalma (daily islamic prayer) and gunned down the men who were then confirmed to be Hindus, in front of their wives. All of them were tourists.
The western media downplays Pakistan sponsored terrorism, with many outlets calling the terrorists "militants", but calling Narendra Modi & the BJP (Ruling party) "Hindu-Nationalist".
The west has funded the monster that is Pakistan, a military dictatorship, masquerading as a democracy. US funded Pervez Musharraf, who proudly sat in the top of Pak govt. in full miliary garb. All this while beating its chest on "values", "ethics" and "morals".