News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sneakers (1992) – 4K Restoration by dylan604 on Tuesday May 06, 2025 @10:32AM (#43905594)
> Shoes are expensive, very durable, and typically one of those items that people have only a few pairs of.

Maybe that used to be true, but modern shoes while expensive are not very durable, and most people have several pairs today.

Re:Sneakers (1992) – 4K Restoration by rbanffy on Tuesday May 06, 2025 @02:44PM (#43908330)
Expensive shoes are still a good indicator of social status.
Re:Sneakers (1992) – 4K Restoration by 542354234235 on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @02:03PM (#43918822)
Modern shoes can be very cheap, which is also not durable at all. Beyond that, price and durability are two different metrics, and can tell you about a person. Some people buy expensive shoes specifically for the durability, which could tell you things about what they value, that they are willing to do research. Some people buy expensive shoes for wrongly perceived durability, which could tell you that they want to be perceived as rugged or refined. Some people buy expensive shoes for their lack of durability, which could tell you that they want people perceive their status (conspicuous consumption).

Someone wearing pristine white Jordans, Red Wings boots, or bottom tier Cole Hann dress shoes can all say things about a person.

Re:Sneakers (1992) – 4K Restoration by Cyphase on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @09:30PM (#43922231)
I mean, seriously, how often do you really look at a man's shoes?
Re:Sneakers (1992) – 4K Restoration by dylan604 on Wednesday May 07, 2025 @10:33PM (#43922563)
according to the people in this thread, a lot. they're judging the book by the shoes it wears.