News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Evolving OpenAI's Structure. Parent comment

Re:Evolving OpenAI's Structure by fooker on Monday May 05, 2025 @04:08PM (#43898929)
Google is pretty far behind. They have random one off demos and they beat benchmarks yes, but try to use Google’s AI stuff for real work and it falls apart really fast.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evolving OpenAI's Structure by adastra22 on Monday May 05, 2025 @04:10PM (#43898954)
People are using Gemini for real work. I prefer Claude myself, but Gemini is as good (or alternatively: as bad) as OpenAI’s models.

The only thing OpenAI has right now is the ChatGPT name, which has become THE word for modern LLMs among lay people.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evolving OpenAI's Structure by Nuzzerino on Monday May 05, 2025 @04:11PM (#43898959)
Define “real work”
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evolving OpenAI's Structure by reasonableklout on Monday May 05, 2025 @04:34PM (#43899191)
That's not what early adopter numbers are showing. Even the poll from r/openai a few days ago show Gemini 2.5 with nearly 3x more votes than o3 (and far beyond Claude): https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1k67bya/what_is_cur...

Anecdotally, I've switched to Gemini as my daily driver for complex coding tasks. I prefer Claude's cleaner code, but it is less capable at difficult problems, and Anthropic's servers are unreliable.

[ Parent | on HN ]