Re:Collections: Why Archers Didn't Volley Fire
by seabass-labrax on Monday May 05, 2025 @10:25AM
(#43895505)
Soup can? That's a bit boring; why not make that, say, an apple, oh and also balance it on the head of the archer's child? Much better!
Re:Collections: Why Archers Didn't Volley Fire
by Ichthypresbyter on Monday May 05, 2025 @12:49PM
(#43897030)
Of course William Tell was a crossbowman so could hold his bow at full draw for as long as he liked.
Re:Collections: Why Archers Didn't Volley Fire
by hirvi74 on Monday May 05, 2025 @03:46PM
(#43898726)
I never was a fan of compound bows. I remember when I was participating in archery as a hobby. The instructor told us that in competition archery, if one uses a recurve bow, then winners are determined by who hits the bullseye (or closest) the most. In compound bow competitions, losers are determined by who hit the bullseye the least. It's a tongue in cheek way of emphasizing the ridiculous accuracy of compound bows.
I prefer the antiquity of recurve bows and the lesser amounts of maintenance that comes with them. Though, I also think compound bows are beyond dangerous in comparison.
I have found that recurve archers seem to be better about 'checking' their arrows after missed shots. Many compound users I have known think that as long as the arrow is not completely snapped, then it's safe to use. I just show them the Google images of what happens when an arrow with hairline cracks explodes the near instant the quick-release is released.
This issue can happen with high draw weight recurve bows, but I have never seen the damage like what a compound bow can do.
Always check your arrows, folks!
A couple months of training and many folks can consistently hit a soup can at 50 yards with a 75# draw (or better). That would be absurd to even contemplate 100 years ago.