They did call it Latek, the X in the name is the Greek letter χ (Chi) and in my opinion, it's not an elitist shibboleth but a way to showcase the advantages of their typesetting system over existing, at the time, methods that didn't invest a lot in rendering non ASCII character sets.
Re:Modern Latex
by xboxnolifes on Monday May 05, 2025 @11:39AM
(#43896259)
So it's not actually LaTaX, it's LaTeχ. Make sure you type it properly i guess.
I'm not sure why you're telling me that. I didn't spell it either way.
It's a capital Chi.
Eh - the name is a bit of fun. Its fun to form communities with in-jokes and tribal knowledge and silly names. It doesn't hurt anyone. Lets not sacrifice everything joyous at the altar of being friendly to noobs.
Is arXiv not pronounced the same as "archive"? I agree with you about LaTeX but arXiv seems like an obvious allusion to "archive"?
Re:Modern Latex
by DemocracyFTW2 on Monday May 05, 2025 @04:18PM
(#43899033)
Well it does lack that final -e of archive, and—fun fact!—like LaTeX which I know as ['la:teç], arXiv could plausibly be pronounced [ar'çi:f] in German although I've never heard anyone pronounce that name. So why is it arXiv not at least arXive with an -e?
Because they're trying to be quirky I guess, but it is still unmistakably a weird spelling of "archive" (especially given the context).
The great thing about language is that you can just change things if enough people play along. Call it gif or jif, arxiv or archive, latex or laytek.