News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Time saved by AI offset by new work created, study suggests by pythonguython on Saturday May 03, 2025 @04:42PM (#43882129)
I agree, and I think most people would say the current models would rank low on creativity metrics however we define them. But to the main point, I don’t see how the quality we call creativity is unique to biological computing machines vs electronic computing machines. Maybe one day we’ll conclusively declare creativity to be a human trait only, but in 2025 that is not a closed question - however it is measured.
Re:Time saved by AI offset by new work created, study suggests by Jensson on Saturday May 03, 2025 @06:45PM (#43882985)
We were talking about LLM here, not computing machines in general. LLM are trained to mimic not to produce novel things, so a person can easily think LLM wont get creative even though some computer program in the future could.
Re:Time saved by AI offset by new work created, study suggests by signatoremo on Sunday May 04, 2025 @12:39AM (#43884532)
> LLM are trained to mimic not to produce novel things

Which LLM? That’s not the purpose of training for any model that I know of.

Re:Time saved by AI offset by new work created, study suggests by namaria on Sunday May 04, 2025 @07:37AM (#43886146)
Training LLMs is literally finding sets of numbers that make them better at mimicking human language.