GCC switches from C to C++

Re:GCC switches from C to C++ by jlgreco on Wednesday August 15, 2012 @03:39PM (#4387779)

I suppose "prolific" does not necessary imply breadth or depth.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GCC switches from C to C++ by eswangren on Wednesday August 15, 2012 @04:12PM (#4387955)

I believe an operating system typically implies both.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GCC switches from C to C++ by duaneb on Wednesday August 15, 2012 @07:24PM (#4388915)

Prolific typically implies many things. I have a deep respect for linux and git, but neither are really prolific.

Anyway, I thought the OP meant he was prolific in his tirades, which is very true.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GCC switches from C to C++ by jlgreco on Wednesday August 15, 2012 @04:22PM (#4388000)

The way I interpreted the word was more "doing lots of things" and less "doing lots of a few things". Either is legitimate in retrospect.

[ Parent | on HN ]