While you might be able to get the purity of the compound itself tested, the user buying it ready for injection or even homebrewing it themselves can still have serious sterility issues, heavy metals contaminates and other nasty leftovers in the batch itself from shady companies that sell these "peptides" and etc.

When a low quality lab in China is producing something that normally costs such a high amount there are always corners cut, quality issues and people manufacturing it that are not using the same quality control and standards you would even get from a compounding pharmacy.

Author William Llewellyn's talk on how the black market of anabolic steroids evolved over the years explains how things like this are made and what sort of contaminates get into gray/black market injectables (regardless of oil or water based).

Anabolic Steroids: an evolving black market (28mins) https://youtu.be/0LL7bL4F9G4

> When a low quality lab in China is producing something that normally costs such a high amount there are always corners cut, quality issues and people manufacturing it that are not using the same quality control and standards you would even get from a compounding pharmacy.

The cost of GLP-1 drugs doesn't come from production costs or complexity, it is purely a function of being on patent.

A month's supply of Ozempic costs less than a dollar to produce. It costs $25k in the US because of patents.

People regularly test black/gray market peptides in labs for both heavy metals and sterility (USP 61 or 71 I believe). The production of something like Testosterone/anabolic steroids is completely different has higher risks of contamination than peptides which use recombinant DNA or solid phase peptide synthesis.

That video is literally about anabolic steroids not peptides. Not to mention there was 0 testing labs in 2012 that users could send their items to, to get tested while there is many now a days. Back then in 2012 unless you had a friend at a University lab that knew analytical chemistry you were out of luck to get anything tested.

You aren't wrong about a lab in China cutting corners, having quality issues and low quality control standards but people don't care if they see 10,000+ people using peptides for decades without a single complaint about infection or real problems.

"is producing something that normally costs such a high amount" the cost has very little to do with the chemicals themself, the cost is about recouping R&D costs and having a 90% profit margin.

Actual regulated drugs are also not that great either. Sometimes these grey market peptides might be tested better than actual FDA-regulated medications. Just dig into Aurobindo and how they literally destroy records and more. An aurobindo-manufactured generic medication I take is significantly worse than any other manufacturer of that generic medication, and I've taken them from about 5 at this point. "Bottle of lies" is a good book to look into.

> Most

I see this error on HN a lot, but the overwhelming majority of people will not do that, because the overwhelming majority of people take the path of least resistance and neither have the domain knowledge nor the drive to figure out how to do things outside the easily packaged path. Your example class of peptide-using bodybuilders are probably in the top 1% of both drive and domain knowledge to have gotten there (probably higher, even - less than 1 in 100 people on the street are that jacked).

A lot of HN users are extremely high-agency people with a significantly-above-average ability to understand how systems work and how to take advantage of that. A lot of said users make the understandable mistake that most people are like them. This is not the case.

It is extremely important if you are in charge of designing a system (as many of us are) that you understand and internalize that any claim of "people will just" that requires more than a few steps will only bear out for a very small minority (which are important edge cases, but should not be your expectation of the average user)

You're right not most. The thing is the barrier to entry is so low now, people don't need "domain knowledge" because there is an "easily packaged path" now a days. These black/gray market peptides are directly advertised on social media not only directly from companies selling them but it has given rise to a whole crop of influencers known as "peptide educators". They lower the barrier to entry, simplify how to do it all and offer servicing essentially coaching people to take peptides.

There is Facebook groups with thousands of 50 year old moms taking gray market peptides, not just top 1% peptide-using bodybuilders. My example of peptide using bodybuilders was about the anecdotal safety of peptides. The barrier to entry previously was ALOT higher, you practically had to either contact a middleman in China and wire money to a random bank account overseas or buy it from a steroid drug dealer, now a days there is thousands of online storefronts that accept credit card and ship domestically that come with visual graphic instructions on how to do everything.

I'm sure when the New York Times writes a big piece about how gray market peptides have become a huge thing in the Fitness social media space, others will recognize it is growing and growing fast.