News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Suno v4.5 by progbits on Friday May 02, 2025 @11:02AM (#43870744)
Aren't they still in active lawsuit with Sony etc about training on music without license? Yet still releasing new products?

I guess they are hoping for the Uber outcome where they earn enough money during the illegal phase so they can pay some tiny fine and keep going.

Re:Suno v4.5 by ronsor on Friday May 02, 2025 @11:20AM (#43870978)
Illegal? If the record companies were so obviously going to win, they could've obtained a preliminary injunction to stop Suno's business. They didn't, so the service continues.
Re:Suno v4.5 by __loam on Friday May 02, 2025 @09:21PM (#43876136)
Pretty sure napster also continued to operate during ongoing legal actions but I am not a lawyer
Re:Suno v4.5 by pier25 on Friday May 02, 2025 @11:38AM (#43871225)
AFAIK the lawsuit is still ongoing.

Suno admitted to train their models with copyrighted music and are now defending the position that music copyrights and royalties are bad for the future of music.

Re:Suno v4.5 by randyrand on Friday May 02, 2025 @04:34PM (#43874313)
I think it's more straightforward to argue it's transformative fair use.
Re:Suno v4.5 by 93po on Friday May 02, 2025 @05:14PM (#43874657)
fair use requires it be non-profit which doesnt work for suno
Re:Suno v4.5 by brookst on Friday May 02, 2025 @05:26PM (#43874759)
I don’t think that’s true. Parodies are protected as transformative fair use and plenty of them are for-profit.
Re:Suno v4.5 by 93po on Saturday May 03, 2025 @10:39AM (#43879328)
you're right it's a grey area, but in the field of music specifically, it's some of the most stringent requirements. the more creative it is, the more it replaces the market for the original, the less of a parody it is (not weird al), the more you will struggle to use fair use as a defense. suno generating music hits all the parts of "this is hard to defend" while also being in the the most litigious possible industry for fair use
Re:Suno v4.5 by __loam on Friday May 02, 2025 @09:24PM (#43876157)
Fair use has consideration for whether the derivative work disrupts the market for the original, it doesn't mean you can't use it for profit as we saw with the Google books case.
Re:Suno v4.5 by TimTheTinker on Friday May 02, 2025 @09:40PM (#43876222)
Not according to US federal statute.

Fair use encompasses a lot of possible scenarios involving copyrighted works which may or may not be commercially licensed: transformative derivative works, short excerpts for purposes of commentary, backups of copies obtained legally, playback for face-to-face instruction, etc.

Re:Suno v4.5 by __loam on Friday May 02, 2025 @09:26PM (#43876167)
Transformative is one of 4 conditions that the court uses to decide if something is fair use. This question is still in active litigation in the courts.
Re:Suno v4.5 by rwmj on Friday May 02, 2025 @04:34PM (#43874316)
I hope no songwriters have listened to Sony music or they could be in trouble.
Re:Suno v4.5 by codedokode on Saturday May 03, 2025 @03:10PM (#43881336)
Suno is not a songwriter.
Re:Suno v4.5 by rwmj on Saturday May 03, 2025 @05:25PM (#43882454)
It's a simulated brain that writes songs ...
Re:Suno v4.5 by brookst on Friday May 02, 2025 @05:24PM (#43874741)
Do most companies just stop releasing product while in legal disputes? I don’t think I’ve ever heard of that.
Re:Suno v4.5 by ronsor on Friday May 02, 2025 @05:42PM (#43874860)
They don't unless a judge orders them. It would be nonsensical to do so as lawsuits typically take years.
Re:Suno v4.5 by velcrobeg on Saturday May 03, 2025 @10:26AM (#43879248)
lawsuitS with Sony, Universal, and Warner Music, indeed. And the RIAA. and the GEMA.